Ten active days, then a Wednesday, then the 40% test
The payout calendar is specific. You need 10 active trading days, and the withdrawal opportunity is Wednesday, not every 14 days and not the next morning. The split on the profit is 100% for the first $10,000 and 90% after. A $10,400 result in that first bucket is $10,000 plus $360. The extra $400 is not paid in full.
The 40% rule is about the shape of the profit, not about the $3,000 trail. If the window you want to withdraw is $10,000, 40% is $4,000. A best day of $4,100 waits. Build the window from days that can each live under that cap. The bot desk should pause a session that is approaching 30% of the profit already booked, so 40% is not a surprise at the close.
A one-day pass still waits on the Master calendar
The evaluation minimum is one trading day, and the target is 6%, or $6,000 on $100,000, with no second profit target. You can be done on Monday. The Master payout still wants 10 active days and a best day at or under 40%. Treat the funded period as a new ledger. A single huge funded day recreates the same share problem even if the evaluation itself had no consistency hurdle.
Option 1 and Option 2 do not change this calendar. They change how you survive until Wednesday. Option 1 trails $3,000 intraday and does not scale. Option 2 trails $3,000 from the 4:59 PM CT balance and stops the day at $2,200. A payout rule cannot repair either breach.
The first $10,000 is the bucket worth keeping boring
Because the first $10,000 is paid at 100%, that is the stretch where a 40% mistake is most annoying. Ten active days averaging $1,000, with none above $4,000, clears the count and the share together. Two days at $5,000 clear the dollars faster and fail the share. The 90% rate only starts after that first bucket, so rushing the bucket to reach 90% is backwards. You give up the full split in order to get to the smaller one.
The listed fee at $100,000 is $145. It is irrelevant to the share math and relevant to the emotion that says the first day should win the fee back with size. Size is what creates the $5,000 day the rule rejects.