2% and 3% on both paths
There is no tighter daily percent hiding on the 1-Step. Both paths are 2% daily and 3% maximum. On $100,000 that is $2,000 and $3,000. The published end-of-day trailing amounts are $2,000 on $50,000, $3,000 on $100,000, and $4,500 on $150,000, locking at the initial balance. Equity Guard can use one daily percent for both labels and still must follow the trailing floor.
Phase 1 is 6%, $6,000 on $100,000. Phase 2 is 0%. Comparing this to a CFD firm that asks for 8% and then 5% will overstate how many targets you have left after the first pass. Minimum trading days are two. The $100,000 fee is $99 a month.
The trail and the flatten, not a second target
The meaningful differences are the end-of-day trail, the 3:10 PM CT flatten, the 5:00 PM CT session, and the 50% consistency rule. They apply across the Combine path. A 1-Step label does not waive the flat. A 2-Step label does not add a 5% Phase 2. The bot should flatten both paths on the same clock.
The largest day on a $100,000 Combine cannot exceed $3,000 if the target is $6,000, because 50% of the target is the ceiling in the published example. That rule can extend the target. It is not different for a path whose Phase 2 is already 0%.
There is no published pass percentage
The page can compare the contracts. It cannot quote a pass rate the firm did not publish. What it can say is that both paths share the tight 2% day and the 3% trail, and that you do not buy a looser day by picking a second step. The 6% target is the profit job. The 0% Phase 2 means you are not asked for another 5% after that.
Weekend holding is prohibited. A strategy that needs Friday-to-Monday exposure does not fit either step. That constraint is larger than the 1-Step versus 2-Step label. If your edge is a multi-day hold, this comparison is the wrong product pair.